Quantcast
Channel: ROS Answers: Open Source Q&A Forum - RSS feed
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 74

When using navsat_transform_node, isn't it a problem to use IMU yaw to compute transform between map and base_link ?

$
0
0
Hello, In [this video from Tom Moore](https://www.osrfoundation.org/tom-moore-working-with-the-robot-localization-package/) at time 12:36, I can see that he sets IMU yaw to true. The consequence of this is that as soon as the robot is started, there is an non zero angle between base_link and map, with X axis of map pointing to the east (except if robot is facing east of course). I think there is an inconsistency with what this picture says ![image description](http://docs.ros.org/kinetic/api/robot_localization/html/_images/figure1.png). I understand here that map and base_link should be aligned at start so that navsat_transform_node can properly compute a transform between utm and map, thanks to the theta angle given by the IMU. Having map and base_link aligned is mandatory because the IMU reports the angle between base_link and east. Can you please point me my mistake, and if there is no mistake, how should map and base_link be related when using navsat_transform_node ? Thank you Yvon

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 74

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>